A Utah prosecutor involved in the case of Tyler Robinson, accused of killing right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, denied any conflict of interest during a hearing on Tuesday. Robinson’s lawyers asked a judge to disqualify local prosecutors, claiming a deputy county attorney’s adult daughter attended the rally where Kirk was shot. They argue that the decision to seek the death penalty just days after the killing shows an emotional response, creating a potential conflict of interest. Chad Grunander, the deputy county attorney, and his daughter testified before Judge Tony Graf in Provo, Utah. Grunander stated his daughter’s presence did not influence the decision to pursue the death penalty. Prosecutors said the choice was based on strong evidence against Robinson. County Attorney Jeffrey Gray confirmed he had considered the death penalty before Robinson’s arrest. He also said the announcement was made early due to public attention on the case. The hearing also addressed procedural issues, including whether graphic videos of the killing should be shown in court. Robinson’s attorneys asked the judge to block the footage and ban cameras, claiming media coverage is biased and could compromise his right to a fair trial. Kirk’s widow and media attorneys urged the judge to keep court proceedings open. Erika Kirk’s lawyer wrote that transparency is essential to prevent speculation, misinformation, and conspiracy theories, which could undermine public confidence in the justice system. Robinson’s defense argued that media outlets have acted as “financial investors” in the case. They accused news organizations of attempting to read the defendant’s lips during meetings with his attorneys. Last month, a TV camera operator zoomed in on Robinson’s face in violation of courtroom rules. Legal experts acknowledged the defense’s concerns. Valerie Hans, a Cornell Law School professor, said media coverage in high-profile cases like this can influence potential jurors. Videos, photos, and news analysis may shape how jurors perceive courtroom evidence. Hans added that exposure to the videos might lead viewers to label the act as especially cruel or heinous before hearing the evidence. Charlie Kirk was a prominent ally of Donald Trump, and his organization, Turning Point USA, helped boost Trump’s 2024 campaign. The political attention surrounding the case could further complicate efforts to ensure a fair trial for Robinson. University of Utah law professor Teneille Brown noted that public assumptions about the shooter and his motives may influence how evidence is received. “People are projecting their own interpretations, creating concerns about whether they can objectively consider the evidence,” she said. Robinson has not entered a plea. Prosecutors say DNA evidence links him to the killing. Reports indicate Robinson texted his partner, saying he targeted Kirk because he “had enough of his hatred.” As the case proceeds, the court must balance transparency, media coverage, and fair trial rights in one of Utah’s most politically charged criminal cases.