JD Vance, former U.S. Senate candidate and vice-president, defended Donald Trump for criticizing CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins for not smiling during a sensitive interview. During an appearance on Megyn Kelly’s podcast, Vance highlighted Trump’s scolding of Collins in the Oval Office. The journalist had questioned the president about victims of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, prompting Trump to comment on her demeanor rather than the topic. Vance called Trump’s reaction “so perceptive.” “Even if you’re asking a tough question and taking your job seriously, why does it always have to be so antagonistic?” Vance said, framing the criticism as insightful. Kelly agreed with Vance, noting that she herself had commented on Collins’ habit of rarely smiling in the past. “She never smiles! Every once in a while, you have to smile,” Kelly said, recalling advice from former Fox News chairman Roger Ailes. “Have some fun,” Vance added. The discussion referenced Ailes, who resigned amid multiple sexual harassment allegations. Kelly and other former Fox hosts had publicly accused Ailes of misconduct. The reference drew attention because it overlooked the context of Collins’ question, which involved survivors of sexual abuse. Trump’s response came as Collins asked about justice for Epstein’s victims. The president suggested the country should “move on” from the scandal, prompting Collins to follow up: “What would you say to the survivors who feel they haven’t gotten justice?” Instead of addressing the question, Trump criticized Collins for not smiling, drawing backlash from critics who viewed the reaction as dismissive of sexual abuse survivors. Collins later explained the seriousness of her question: “These are survivors of a sexual abuser.” Vance and Kelly did not focus on the sensitive nature of the question. Instead, they framed Trump’s comments as a critique of Collins’ demeanor, praising the former president’s approach as perceptive and necessary. This episode reflects ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and journalists. Trump has frequently criticized reporters for tone and style, sometimes sparking claims of sexism or intimidation. Supporters like Vance continue to defend these interactions as fair commentary on media conduct. The controversy highlights the balance between professional journalism and public figures’ reactions. While Collins aimed to address a serious topic, Trump’s focus on her demeanor shifted attention to style over substance. Vance’s comments come amid his ongoing political ambitions and alignment with Trump’s approach to media relations. By framing the criticism as insightful, Vance positioned himself alongside Trump’s media strategies. Observers note that discussions about journalistic demeanor often intersect with broader debates on press freedom, gender dynamics, and the treatment of sensitive subjects in political interviews. The episode with Collins underscores how quickly questions about serious matters can turn into debates over behavior rather than content. While Trump has not endorsed a clear successor to his political position, Vance’s praise signals alignment with Trump’s style and priorities. Supporters argue that addressing journalist demeanor is part of holding the press accountable, while critics emphasize the importance of focusing on the issues being discussed, particularly matters involving victims of abuse. The Trump-Kaitlan Collins incident continues to spark conversation about appropriate conduct in political interviews and the role of tone versus content. Vance’s remarks illustrate how political figures may defend controversial comments while avoiding discussion of the underlying sensitive issues.