Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi has repeated former President Donald Trump’s controversial claim about antifascist protesters. Speaking on a popular news show Tuesday night, Bondi said antifascist groups, often called antifa, display signs that are identical and pre-printed, suggesting outside funding. “One of the things about antifa you’ve heard President Trump say multiple times,” Bondi told the show host, “they are very organized. You’re seeing people with thousands of signs that all match, pre-bought, pre-put together… someone is funding it.” Trump has made similar statements in recent weeks, claiming that he can recognize paid antifascist protesters because of the matching signs they carry at rallies. Bondi’s remarks echo this view and have drawn attention for repeating the former president’s assertions on a national platform. Despite these claims, there is no clear evidence that such a coordinated system of pre-printed signs exists among antifascist protesters. Journalists and fact-checkers have noted that photos and videos from recent demonstrations show a wide variety of handmade signs, often with unique messages and designs. Protesters in cities such as Portland, Oregon, and Los Angeles have been particularly visible in national media. Bondi referred to protests in these cities as examples of antifa activity, claiming that the signs in these demonstrations show the organized nature of the group. However, images from these events show creative, individualized signs made by participants rather than mass-produced materials. Experts on political movements and protests say that the idea of uniform signs as proof of organized funding is misleading. “Protesters often make their own signs or share designs online,” said one political analyst. “There is no evidence of a central organization printing thousands of identical placards for antifa.” Trump and Bondi’s statements have stirred debate among politicians and the public. Critics argue that such claims exaggerate the influence of antifascist groups and mischaracterize peaceful demonstrations. Supporters of Trump and Bondi maintain that there is an organized effort behind some protests, though evidence remains limited. Antifa has no formal membership structure, which complicates claims of central coordination. Demonstrations associated with the movement are typically loosely organized and include a range of participants, from local activists to concerned citizens. Social media platforms have often played a role in spreading protest information, but this does not indicate uniform funding or centrally issued materials. The discussion over matching signs and alleged paid protesters comes amid a broader political debate in the United States about protest movements, public safety, and political polarization. Both Trump and Bondi have used the claim to argue for stricter measures against what they describe as organized extremist activity. Observers note that claims about identical signs have appeared frequently in conservative media and social media posts in recent months. These reports often lack independent verification, relying instead on selective images or anecdotal accounts. Fact-checkers caution against taking such claims at face value, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based reporting. Despite the controversy, Bondi’s remarks have helped keep the topic in public discussion. Analysts say repeating such claims on national television reinforces partisan narratives and can influence public perceptions of protest movements. Political commentators have also noted that claims linking antifascist groups to outside funding or mass-produced materials serve as a way to question the legitimacy of protests without examining the substance of participants’ messages. Critics argue that focusing on the physical appearance of protest signs distracts from the issues being raised by demonstrators, such as social justice, labor rights, and community policing. As public debate continues, the discrepancy between claims of organized, funded protests and the actual evidence on the ground remains a focal point. Images and footage from recent events consistently show handmade, diverse signs, contradicting the notion of a centralized system distributing identical placards. The controversy underscores the challenges of verifying claims in politically charged environments. Analysts emphasize that accurate reporting requires careful review of multiple sources, particularly when discussing protests and activist groups with fluid membership and decentralized structures.